‘Insufficient’ detail in Exmouth seafront plan, say town council
PUBLISHED: 07:55 25 December 2017
East Devon District Council should go back to the drawing board over plans for temporary attractions, including a giant cinema screen, on the Exmouth seafront regeneration site, say the town council.
Concerns have been raised over a lack of information on the attractions, which also includes pop-up food outlets and a children’s play area, set to be in place for 12 months from March next year.
An outline planning application is for the Queen’s Drive site - formerly home to Exmouth Fun Park which was evicted in September this year.
EDDC says the attractions will stop the site from becoming ‘unused and derelict’ prior to its redevelopment as part of phase three of the Queen’s Drive regeneration scheme.
At a planning committee meeting this week, Exmouth Town Council opposed the application raising concerns over the lack of information given on the nature of the attractions.
At the meeting, councillor Bill Nash branded the plans ‘a blank piece of paper’.
He said: “There is insufficient information for a decision to be made and I would ask the applicant to withdraw this application and resubmit it.
“The documentation says that at this stage because the end users are not being specified, the size, extent and nature of the structures cannot be identified – how can we give approval on something if we don’t know what it is?”
Nick Hookway, chairman of the Save Exmouth Seafront campaign group, said: “The idea of slicing up the site with three categories of attractions is to be deplored as being quite unnecessary. The application is lacking any form of detail as to the type of facilities that will be available next summer and in no way makes up for the closure of the popular, successful and much valued ‘fun park’.”
An EDDC spokesperson said: “This planning application is for uses that are specifically temporary and it responds directly to town council and wider public concern that the Queen’s Drive area might be unused for a while as development of sites happens.
“It is unfortunate that the town council felt unable to respond positively and promptly to the district’s desire to pave the way for a mix of new, temporary attractions.”