Anonymity questioned
It is with dismay that I read in your newspaper, inflammatory letters from people who appear not to have either the good manners or the strength of character to sign to their names and/or addresses. Why is this allowed?
It is with dismay that I read in your newspaper, inflammatory letters from people who appear not to have either the good manners or the strength of character to sign to their names and/or addresses.
Why is this allowed? Whether the letter is one of fact or opinion, surely it is reasonable behaviour to admit to sending it in?
Recently, this practice has been particularly prevalent in the matter of the Hushons' proposed development for the seafront, Budleigh Salterton.
Generally (but not always), this way of 'signing off' a letter, appears to support those against this building. As an already charged local issue, it really cannot help to read 'opinions' in print and then 'name and address withheld/concerned of X' etc.
Of course your newspaper should retain the right to withhold such information, should it be deemed really necessary. However, I fail to understand how so many of these letters addressed to you can fall into this category.
Finally, it is my understanding that unsubstantiated and attributable falsehoods in print (be they intended or not) are potentially libellous. Is this charge really what those who write anonymously fear?
Most Read
- 1 Put the bunting out - East Devon gets ready for Jubilee revelry
- 2 New name and fresh look for Exmouth Museum
- 3 Found: Wanted man from Exmouth
- 4 Witness appeal after Exmouth assault
- 5 Exmouth to join national beacon lighting programme to mark Queen’s Platinum Jubilee
- 6 Budleigh Lions support town's new community larder
- 7 East Devon beaches given prestigious blue flag award
- 8 First hybrid meeting for Exmouth’s U3A branch
- 9 New book about royal celebrations of the past
- 10 M5 all lanes now reopened.
Ann Coals,
100 Granary Lane,
Budleigh Salterton.