It is with dismay that I read in your newspaper, inflammatory letters from people who appear not to have either the good manners or the strength of character to sign to their names and/or addresses. Why is this allowed?
It is with dismay that I read in your newspaper, inflammatory letters from people who appear not to have either the good manners or the strength of character to sign to their names and/or addresses.
Why is this allowed? Whether the letter is one of fact or opinion, surely it is reasonable behaviour to admit to sending it in?
Recently, this practice has been particularly prevalent in the matter of the Hushons' proposed development for the seafront, Budleigh Salterton.
Generally (but not always), this way of 'signing off' a letter, appears to support those against this building. As an already charged local issue, it really cannot help to read 'opinions' in print and then 'name and address withheld/concerned of X' etc.
You may also want to watch:
Of course your newspaper should retain the right to withhold such information, should it be deemed really necessary. However, I fail to understand how so many of these letters addressed to you can fall into this category.
Finally, it is my understanding that unsubstantiated and attributable falsehoods in print (be they intended or not) are potentially libellous. Is this charge really what those who write anonymously fear?
- 1 Exmouth road extension backed in parliament
- 2 Exmouth local set to brave the shave for friend Simon
- 3 Appeal for Lifeboat volunteer guides for new station tours
- 4 Fancy a pint? Help support the survival of your local
- 5 Devon played a major role in the English Civil War
- 6 Budleigh's community workshop is proud of its heritage
- 7 United front needed to ensure Devon does not remain the poor relation
- 8 Bouncing back with our Library of Things
- 9 Former pupil returns with inspiration after success in Paralympic Games
- 10 Auctioneers are becoming more accessible by utilising new technology
100 Granary Lane,