The council is forecasting a better-than-budgeted financial position at the halfway point of the year, although questions remain over the scale of housing investment and the effect of staff vacancies.
East Devon District Council's six-month finance monitoring report forecasts a £353,000 favourable year-end position in its General Fund for 2026/27. If realised, that would leave the General Fund balance at £4.853 million at the end of March 2027.
The figures were presented to Cabinet on Wednesday, November 4, by finance director Simon Davey, who said there were no material concerns he needed to draw to members' attention at that stage.
Read more
Devon County Council's budget is set to 'break even' this financial year
'Surprise' as extra £12m extra borrowing required for East Devon's social housing
Multi-million broadband windfall bolsters Devon’s budget
The report cautions that the forecast is based on information available at September 30 and could change before the end of the financial year. One significant influence is staffing: the council recorded an average of about 75 vacancies during the first six months, with unfilled posts contributing to employment-cost savings.
There have also been financial pressures, including increased fuel costs affecting the council's Edenserv operations. The report says further calculations involving the leisure management contract were expected to affect the final quarter and had not yet been fully incorporated into the forecast.
The Housing Revenue Account, which funds the council's landlord services, is forecast to balance overall despite a £195,899 shortfall in rent and other income and £35,942 more revenue spending than budgeted. Those pressures have been offset by reducing the planned revenue contribution towards capital expenditure by £231,842.
Its capital programme, however, is forecast to cost £19.899 million against a budget of £18.214 million — a difference of £1.685 million. The report attributes the change principally to higher planned programme and major repairs expenditure.
Cllr Mike Goodman (Sidmouth Sidford, Conservative) asked how the difference should be interpreted and whether it would affect the council's wider budget, given the funding assumptions in the report.
Mr Davey said the figure did not mean individual building contracts were running over their agreed prices. Instead, housing officers were projecting that more of the programme would be delivered during the current year, after work in previous years had slipped behind schedule.
"It's not an overspend against particular contracts, particular budget areas," he told the meeting. "It's actually delivering a programme that in previous years we haven't delivered in full. We're now catching up."
He said a full housing team was in place and projecting that it could complete the planned work, but finance officers would continue to monitor the position. He did not expect the effect on loan interest and principal repayments to be material at this stage.
The report also references earlier requests for £500,000 of internal resources and £1.3 million towards external resources associated with local government reorganisation and transformation, which are expected to be funded from reserves rather than immediately changing the General Fund forecast.
Cabinet noted the identified variances rather than voting through a new budget or additional spending on individual housing contracts. Officers will continue updating the forecasts as the financial year progresses.
Share